Piecewise Soil Moisture Stress

This page documents the piecewise (linear/threshold with curvature) soil moisture stress function used in ClimaLand's vegetation module. The stress factor $\beta \in [0,1]$ scales leaf photosynthesis (and thus stomatal conductance) as soil moisture declines, following a simple, interpretable formulation. See Egea et al. [27], the ClimaLand code is here.


Summary

  • Purpose: convert soil wetness to a stress multiplier that reduces assimilation and stomatal conductance.
  • Inputs: volumetric soil water content $\theta$ (or relative water content), model thresholds.
  • Outputs: scalar stress factor $\beta$ applied within the photosynthesis/stomatal sub-models.

Model formulation

Let $\theta$ be the volumetric water content at some depth. Define two thresholds:

First, $\theta_{low}$wilting (or residual) water content: below this, stress is total ($\beta = 0$).

Second, $\theta_{high}$Field capacity (or porosity) water content: above this, no stress ($\beta = 1$).

With $\theta_{low} < \theta_{high}$, the stress factor is

\[\beta(\theta) = \begin{cases} 0, & \theta \leq \theta_{low}, \\ \left( \dfrac{\theta - \theta_{low}}{\theta_{high} - \theta_{low}} \right)^c, & \theta_{low} < \theta < \theta_{high}, \\ 1, & \theta \geq \theta_{high}. \\ \end{cases}\]


Variables & units

QuantitySymbolUnitsNotes
Volumetric water content$\theta$m³ m⁻³root-zone or layer-weighted
Low water content threshold$\theta_{low}$m³ m⁻³wilting point or residual
High water content threshold$\theta_{high}$m³ m⁻³field capacity or porosity
Stress multiplier$\beta$0 (full stress) … 1 (no stress)
Curvature parameter$c$controls concavity of the stress response

Parameters

ParameterDescriptionExample range
$\theta_{low}$lower threshold (wilting or residual)0.05–0.15
$\theta_{high}$upper threshold (field capacity or porosity)0.55–0.75
$c$curvature parameter shaping the transition1–5

Numerical details & coupling

Soil moisture, $\theta$, is either prescribed as a single value in the root zone (for standalone canopy models, with a prescribed soil component), or else we compute $\beta$ as a factor of depth using $\theta$ as a function of depth, as specified by the prognostic soil model. In the latter case, we then average $\beta(z)$ over the column using the root distribution function (also a function of$z$), as a weighting factor.

Scalar stress, $\beta$, multiplies leaf assimilation, $A_{n}$, which in turn reduces $g_{s}$ that scales with $A_{n}$.